American History: Salem Witch Trials 1692

In beginning this site, one of my primary concerns is to correct some of the common misunderstandings and misconceptions about this tragic event in U.S. Colonial history. Some of these are so basic that it is surprising that they have become so firmly entrenched in our public consciousness, while others are more abstract, and merit some serious discussion. It is my hope that this might become a forum for some serious discussions focusing on the Salem witch trials, the events surrounding them, and the various theories that have been offered by way of explanation.


A misunderstood event 
Sunday, November 18, 2007, 12:34 AM - Common misconceptions, History of Salem, Massachusetts, Witchcraft history
Posted by The Historian
The Salem witchcraft trials are perhaps the most well known and yet misunderstood series of events in American history. They are not unique to colonial New England since literally dozens of witchcraft cases took place in Massachusetts and Connecticut prior to 1692. They are not unique to Puritanism, nor should the Puritans as a group be castigated for the then pervasive belief in witchcraft which was common among the people of Europe--rich or poor, educated or ignorant, Protestant, Catholic, noble or commoner, from earliest times down to the advent of the Enlightenment.

The Salem trials have been wrongfully used by some historians, and by more than a few less academic writers, as a means to discredit the New England Puritans and their 17th Century effort to establish a reformed, theocratic commonwealth in the New World. Not discounting the great travesty of justice the Salem episode represents, frankly, it might have been much worse. Consider that of the over two-hundred individuals who were "cried out against" by the so-called, "afflicted children", only twenty-three convictions are brought in. Nineteen persons are convicted and ultimately hanged and one very brave and somewhat uncooperative individual--Gile Corey--is subjected to death by the torture of forte peine et dure ("pressing")---a medieval practice allowed by English Common Law, and not devised by some pathological Puritan court officer.

In fact, the great majority of cases involving witchcraft in Puritan New England beginning in the 1640's and ending in the 1690's resulted in verdicts of innocence or dismissal, not conviction and execution. This compares quite favorably to the multiple thousands of cases of alleged witchcraft in Europe, the majority of which resulted in conviction and death for those accused between 1400 and 1700. This tragic point is, I believe, often conveniently overlooked by those who wish to characterize the Puritans of New England as a group of unusually intolerant, fanatics bent upon harming all those who did not confrom to their highly regimented and, to most contemporary observers, distastefully religious way-of-life.

It is their way of saying to their readers in effect, "See! This is what comes of a society determined to be devoted to a standard of faith based upon the teachings of Christ...fanaticism, judgmentalism, hypocrisy and persecution!"

In actuality, the 17th Cenury was, by-in-large an intolerant and violent time in which to live regardless of one's religious beliefs and personal perspective. Everyone--Protestant and Catholic--sought a place where they might live without fear of persecution. It is time that contemporary historians and writers attempt to understand the Salem witchcraft episode as it fits within the larger context of European culture and society, and not as some aberrant, localized manifestation of Puritan Calvinist theology.
view entry ( 1670 views )   |  permalink

<<First <Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next> Last>>

Privacy Policy